I got a really good question last week via twitter/email and after yesterday's twitter problems, it's appropriate to address this now. Here's what I was asked:
From your perspective on blogging, what's the advantage of actually doing a blog, over having a well-developed page on Facebook--where you not only share regularly updated status reports, but can also post Notes (where I imagine what would have been posted to a blog would be posted on Facebook), can easily share media, engage people in conversation and relationships, and organically have your updates propagated to other friends' pages, etc.?
It's an excellent question and one that does come up in some form when I speak and teach.
First, let's look at what happened on Twitter. Yesterday, with no explanation for nearly 4 hours, hundreds of thousands of legitimate twitter accounts were suspended citing "suspicious activity." People on Facebook, FriendFeed and blogs went nuts.
OMG! We can't communicate with our followers!
I admit that I got a bit freaked out too when I discovered my account had been suspended when I tried to retweet a client's blog post and got a big warning message. That was before I knew that so many other accounts were suspended. Once it became apparent that it wasn't just me, I calmed down. Within about four hours most accounts had been restored and all was good again in the world ;-)
But what if this happened on Facebook? I have many colleagues whose accounts have been shut down with no warning or explanation. It took weeks to get a response and get their accounts reinstated.
This is why I "preach" that your blog is your hub. It's your home base. It's where you want to drive all that social traffic ... to a space on the web you own and control. Yes, of course something could happen to your server and shut down your site, but at least you're in control.
You are not in control of what happens on Facebook and twitter. Those sites do not belong to you and you are at their mercy. What if you had spent tons of time building a fan page, posting content via the Notes app, building your list of friends and fans, etc. and one day Facebook shuts down? Now what? You may have lost everything if that's you're only home on the web.
Many smart people call social networking sites "satellites" or "outposts." Chris Brogan has an excellent post outlining what he calls "a simple presence framework" where he talks about using your outposts to socialize and connect and then gently guide people back to your home base (blog!).
Ultimately, my goal is to have content that is so attractive that people will want to trade their email address for a free report, video course, etc. I connect socially on Facebook and twitter (and I have a presence on many other social networking sites as well) having conversations and sharing links to my content. Occasionally I promote a teleclass or new product or use an affiliate link to promote something a colleague is offering.
I drive people back to one of my blogs where I can get more intimate and share more information in depth. This helps prospective clients get to "know, like and trust" me, which may entice them to go to the next level and request my free report or buy my product. Once they do that, they're on my email list. They've said "yes, I want to know/get more from you."
New people find out about me every day on Facebook and Twitter, and as they watch, listen and interact, they decide whether or not to follow me home (to my blog). If Facebook or twitter were to disappear, poof! -- without a blog and an email list, all my friends and followers would be gone. But because my primary connection points are via my blogs and I frequently offer valuable content and programs, I would not suffer (too much!) if Facebook or twitter disappeared forever.
As Mari Smith says in her post about lessons learned from the twitter incident:
Twitter [and Facebook] is only one platform for visibility, branding, community building and connecting. It’s vital to your social media success to be diversified and have a) a built-out Facebook profile (unless you’re choosing to only use your profile for close personal friends/family), b) a built-out Facebook Fan Page, c) an active blog with increasing subscribers, d) an active account on LinkedIn with increasing contacts e) an active channel on YouTube, f) an active, built-out account on FriendFeed… and many, many more platforms.
And here's a two minute video where I talk about your blog being the hub of your online activity.
So what's the lesson here?
- Build a blog as your home base - don't depend only on 3rd party sites for your web presence
- Build a list, separate from your sites, so you can communicate and connect and sell
Where do you stand on this issue: why blog when you can use Facebook for your online presence?



I agree with all reasons listed (blog over Facebook), and would like to add one more perspective. When I post a FB status update or similar, it goes to the Fans' newsfeed, along with everything else. Unless they've taken Mari's (?) tip to set up a Friends list and have it dominate the feed (and I hope I'm on that list), it's easy for my post to be lost in the feed. But when I post up my blog, it goes to my RSS and e-mail subscribers in a manner that gets attention (and hopefully they read it...). AND my blog post goes to my FB Notes page and from there into my Status Update. It seems to me that there are more opportunities to get "eyes" via a blog than solely FB.
Posted by: JDinNapa | Monday, July 06, 2009 at 12:40 PM
You are absolutely 100% right on. Because of the nature of RSS feeds, you can get your blog content out on multiple sites so followers and new fans can find you where THEY hang out, which may be in many different places. You can leverage your content so much more effectively from a blog than on than on a single social networking site.
Thanks for adding that point to the conversation!
Posted by: Denise Wakeman | Monday, July 06, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Great points Denise, but also don't forget that traffic for most buisness blogs come from Search anyway. To me, this is the primary reason to have your social media strategy start with a blog at the hub. From there you can push your content to your Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn groups....but for every visitor you get through those channels, odds are that you will get significantly more through search.
Chris Baggott
CEO
Compendium Blogware
www.compendiumblogware.com
Posted by: Chris Baggott | Monday, July 06, 2009 at 01:20 PM
Yikes! How could I forget the most important thing???? Of course, Chris, you're right. Your blog is indexed by the search engines and Facebook notes are not (that I'm aware of). And yes, #1 source of traffic is search. My #2 source lately is Twitter and Facebook is between #3-5 the last few weeks.
Thanks for bringing me back to basics.
Posted by: Denise Wakeman | Monday, July 06, 2009 at 01:30 PM
Thanks, Denise... you know, I *heard* that message at SOBCon, but for some reason, it didn't connect for me until just now.
Posted by: Anastacia | Monday, July 06, 2009 at 01:43 PM
Hey Denise,
Great tips on why to keep blogging and not over rely on FB/Twitter. Somehow I narrowly escaped the Twitter crackdown yesterday but I know some that did not.
We've been using the blogs w/ the other social media components for almost 1 1/2 now and it really does create great sense of connection and rapport with people in my community.
Thanks for sharing your wisdom!
Melanie Benson Strick
http://www.theceofactor.com/blog
http://www.successconnections.com/articles
Posted by: Melanie Strick | Monday, July 06, 2009 at 02:36 PM
I agree that the blog should be the hub, primarily because of the control you can have over your presence and your content (as you pointed out!). I'm currently trying to convince a couple of people that they need a blog or website to drive their fans and followers to - maybe this article will help!
Posted by: Gladys | Monday, July 06, 2009 at 02:47 PM
Great post, Denise. A few weeks ago, @SteveRubel inspired a few posts around the idea of blogging as "slow" or "antiquated." Some read it as "dead." Both @ChrisBrogran and @CopyBlogger jumped out there with blog posts in defense of blogging. Over @Oneicity inspired by the same topic, we wrote saying "Blogging is for deeper conversations with a longer shelf life for a broader audience." Facebook, like Twitter, is great for quick conversation and pointing people to the blog. Facebook is pretty much limited to people who are on Facebook. Blogs are pretty much available to anyone with internet access. We tell our clients if they have to start, Facebook is okay for toes in the water, but blog (the bigger undertaking) is best and should be next. We'll definitely refer our clients to your post to help make the point.
~Kris
Posted by: Kris Hoots | Monday, July 06, 2009 at 03:07 PM
Denise,
All your points are spot on. When my acct was suspended yesterday, I thought, "well, I still have the blog."
I've noticed that in terms of getting an idea out to a larger audience, my blog is much more influential. Partly because of its more permanent nature, partly because it is always displaying my own message 24/7, but mostly because I'm in control of its content and tone. Not much point in being an entrepreneur if others are in control of my message.
www.TheTravelingOffice.com
Posted by: Glory Gray | Monday, July 06, 2009 at 05:30 PM
Perfect timing - I was just thinking last night if I should continue my blog (which I'm awful at updating!) or focus more on my Facebook page. Good food for thought and a great reminder to have a backup regardless of where your primary content resides.
Posted by: Cindy Opong | Monday, July 06, 2009 at 05:34 PM